Now enjoy lower temps and better performance : ), you forgot to test other avx workloads, blender, Occt or Prime might trigger a different avx clock and that -120mv is enough to crash/reboot the system, -120mv is no big deal uder normal avx, but heavy avx drop your voltage to 1.15-1.2 and -120mv there is too much. For me the offset was the best thing I have done to boost performance and reduce temps. With the 3900X chart, there’s a more clear division during the multithreaded test with stock the lowest (1.23V), then the offset (1.32V), then the 1V results (1.34-1.35V). cooling them will keep it cooler in the long run and the cooler electronics work the better theh operate so my focus was temps -> then frequency-> THEN backing down voltages which reminds me it is at 4.1GHz or 4.0. In the new window, tick the “Unlock Adjustable Voltage” box. Thank for your awnser, the problem is that i dont know how to change the offset voltage on my gigabyte motherboard, i just can't find the option I have a 3900x with the stock cooler and a gigabyte x570 UD motherboard. As mentioned earlier we’ve chosen not to include the results we gathered on the X570 Master board, but they back-up all the results we’ve shown for the Godlike so far. I would lower your offset a little bit ( maybe at -0.0725 V) because in my opinion you are slightly reducing performance with -0.1 V, but don’t worry about voltage. At least that was how my 2700x performed. This actually only dropped benchmark scores by less than 5%, but didn't change the CPU temps by any noticeable amount. 1. Voltage offset is your friend. To test for the clock stretching I just use Cinebench r20. Press J to jump to the feed. "Override Mode" is recommended for overclocking. 0.1v undervolt and faster than this guy's stock 3900x using completely different benchmarks than the other 24 tests run against myself. SoC voltage, VDDP voltage & more. Εκτός αν ζείτε σε Igloo. With the 3900X chart, there’s a more clear division during the multithreaded test with stock the lowest (1.23V), then the offset (1.32V), then the 1V results (1.34-1.35V). Keep pbo enabled and use a minus voltage offset keep stepping down from 0.00625 to say 0.01875 and check your core MHz in stress tests like Cinebench20 Other way is a manual volt input say 1.3 or 1.325 but and force an all core overclock but the. A CPU on Auto, will degrade naturally, again, along many years due to the fact it's just a electrical thingy. Για overclockιng** χωρίς υδρόψυξη ξεχάστε το. Trotzdem sollte die CPU nicht ins Temperatur Limit laufen, vor allem wen man Highend Kühlkomponenten einsetzt. Like way too high. As mentioned in other threads I’m currently trying to undervolt my 2700X. Overclocking-Guru Roman "der8auer" Hartung (sprich: "der Bauer") hat sich in Zusammenarbeit mit dem für den Sockel AM4 vorgeknöpft und deren freien Multiplikator genutzt, um die schon regulär sehr hohe Taktfrequenz von 3,8 GHz noch weiter anzuheben. The most interesting part of these results, however, are the scores with a negative voltage offset: the Godlike board was stable with an offset as low as -0.1V using the 3900X, and gained 2% over the stock multithreaded score. Therefore the maximum DC offset occurs when the voltage is zero. On the R9 3900X, clocks were less constant, but it still reported holding higher clocks than stock with 4225MHz during the multithreaded tests. The only other notables are the 3600 with a -.05V offset on the X570 Master, which was slightly cooler than stock in multithreaded testing with an extremely small bump to its average score, and the 3900X with a 0.1V offset on the MSI Godlike, which was much cooler than stock in single-threaded testing but with minor performance degradation. There’s an unholy number of charts that could be generated with the data we’ve gathered, so we’ll be focusing on the MSI Godlike board for most of this piece, just because the graphs for it are a little easier to read. Since AMD doesn’t specify voltage, since it varies based on workload and boost frequency, I’ve attempted to specify the most common voltage seen during a similar load (Prime95). In this video, we’ll demonstrate how to know when undervolting is working versus not working, talk about the gains or losses, and get some hard numbers for the Master and Godlike motherboards. 1.4v when it actually isn't drawing much power is fine, just use a -0.05v offset, all 3900x can handle that without a dip in performance, or -0.1v if ur lucky. So i re applied thermal paste after cleaning, same thing, then i swapped out the prism, used a cooler master hyper 212 evo, and was still at 66°C. That means no LLC overrides or anything like that, so the boards will behave differently based on how the manufacturers configured them. I haven't played with the voltage offset yet, but I did try adjusting the PPT from 142W to other levels. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, R9 3900X | 2080Ti FTW3 Ultra | AW3418DW and 2x S2716DGs, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JscRwIH3OAY. AW: i5 2500k - Offset Voltage immer über 1.4V Ich lese es mit HWinfo64 aus. Seems like best I can get is 4075Mhz~4100Mhz with 1usmus power plan and settings and -0.0625 voltage offset (reduces max core peak from 4625Mhz to 4600Mhz but W/E). We didn't mess much with the mesh, but you might be able to get to 3.2Ghz with 1.25-1.3v mesh voltage. Running PBO with +200mhz, scaler at x10, rest auto and just the positive offset. In POV-Ray, running the 3900X at a flat 4.3GHz at 1.35V gives it a 8.2% performance boost over stock. Typically the CPU starts downclocking due to thermals. CPU: Ryzen 9 3900x @ 4.25Ghz -0.1000 Vcore Offset CPU Cooler: EVGA CLC 360mm AIO w/ 3x120mm Corsair ML Pro R G B Fans Memory/RAM: HyperX Predator R G … All forum topics; Previous Topic; Next Topic; 5 Replies AlHill. I am getting about 4566.6 max. Pushing an offset lower than -.05V on the X570 Master actually did cause instability and boot problems. Scored higher CB 20 in MT bench and CPU-Z bench mode. Override+Offset Mode is the Override Mode plus Offset voltage, while Adaptive+Offset, as the name implies, is Adaptive Mode plus Offset voltage. Cinebench at 80° is not out of ordinary (on my system I reach 78°). Not sure if that is their marketing tactic but is pretty simple. Limit your EDC to 140 as well. Για overclockιng** χωρίς υδρόψυξη ξεχάστε το. I posted mine. It’s the 3600 set to 1V that requests the highest voltages during the multithreaded test, at about 1.4V versus 1.36-1.37V stock and offset. Go back -0.01 or -.015 from the offset value that you got the reduced score in. It's a bit weird to dial in though. Single-threaded scores were largely unaffected and actually decreased slightly on the Godlike board with the voltage offset, so the -.05 offset for the 3900X on the Master is the best combination we’ve tried. Editorial, Testing: Patrick LathanHost: Steve BurkeVideo: Andrew Coleman. Treiber und BIOS ist aktuell. Increasing GFX voltage to 1.3V did nothing, and did not change the voltage readings at all. These next charts are all frequency plots. Since Silicon Lottery tests AVX2 loads, the CPU max frequency will be rated for practically the worst-case scenario. Produktinformationen - der8auer Ryzen 9 3900X 3,8 GHz (Matisse) pretested @ 4,20 GHz Sorgenfrei übertakten für das Extra an Gaming-Power! To paraphrase Reddit user Boxman90’s response post, lowering vcore a little bit without being in OC mode (locking the clocks, etc.) I've noticed large benefits with this on pbo and auto oc and it's not the power bug. Super User Mark as New; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; Subscribe to RSS Feed; Permalink; Print; Email to a Friend; Report Inappropriate Content ‎06-14-2020 10:27 AM. Lowering vcore a lot will initiate “clock stretching,” with the result that monitoring software will report normal/higher clocks while actual performance drops. The content ended up indirectly demonstrating some unique AMD Ryzen 3000 behaviors that we thought worth testing for ourselves. YMMV because of silicon and cooling differences. Thank for your awnser, the problem is that i dont know how to change the offset voltage on my gigabyte motherboard, i just can't find the option As long as you stay under 1.45v and 90*C you're fine for long term use. Wir haben außerdem die Werte für einen Ryzen 7 3700X und einen Ryzen 9 3900X ermittelt: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero, BIOS 0702, AGESA 1.0.0.3 AB CPU VID (BIOS) For me the offset was the best thing I have done to boost performance and reduce temps. My default process is undervolting via my BIOS’ offset mode and reducing the voltage step by step. Turn AMD Cool n Quiet from Auto to Enabled. /r/AMD is community run and does not represent AMD in any capacity unless specified. That was encouraging, because it meant we were hitting real limits rather than fooling ourselves by setting an unrealistically low manual vcore, so there was a chance it might actually help performance. The system boots fine and doesn’t show any signs of instability, but on both motherboards there was a very real decrease in performance. It may be voltage, power or temp, or a combination of the three. It seems that Auto means off. We did this stock, set to 1V vcore in BIOS, and then with the best negative vcore offset we could manage, which was usually .05V. It benefits this cooler and the stock cooler far more. Hi, I need to reduce my CPU voltage,but I can't able to access the core voltage offset in Intel XTU. Re: Max safe voltage for 3900x overclocking? ... there is no thermal offset, so the temperature reported is the correct temperature. -0.05 is the sweet spot for my setup. We controlled vcore in the tests that called for it, we applied XMP and custom timings and voltage to the DRAM, we maxed out fan speeds and kept ambient temperatures and cooling as constant as possible, but otherwise we used the motherboards’ auto settings. Consider adding a negative voltage offset. Single-threaded testing pushed them closer together, with all the results landing in the 1.47-1.49V range. Stock vcore for the R5 3600, shown here, was reported as about 1.39V under all-core load or about 1.344V with the negative offset applied, and both fluctuated between 1.38-1.4V in the single threaded test. Using a slight negative offset voltage with low LLC as @coercitiv suggested earlier should also work with the temp limit. I’ve highlighted all the sensors in HWiNFO that we’ll be using during our benchmarking A few notes: 1. It’s also possible to tweak voltage down on our 3900X for some very minor benefits. Light load will be up to 1.58v depending on power plan and BIOS.I say 1.58v because it is the highest voltage I have seen.This high voltage is to get the high boost on cores.Highest boost I seen was 4750Mhz on 3800X Now as long as temperatures are within AMD limits ,I would say no problems and try not to let it bug … I run with a fairly high -0.120 undervolt offset but even with that I don't experience any stability or clock stretching. I was only monitoring cpufreq of cpu0 so you dont get to see the max pbo across all cores but that gets too messy to view when you're viewing 24 cores. We recommend decreasing this to “-100mV” to start. I also see 4.350MHz to 4.375MHz while gaming instead of 4.300MHz with auto vcore offset. Resultat sind Instabilitäten und Boot-Probleme. We ran the 3600 and the 3900X each both on the Gigabyte X570 Master and the MSI X570 Godlike, running Cinebench R20 three times multithreaded and then once single threaded while logging in HWiNFO and recorded the scores. R9 3900X - 4.1-4.2 when most or all cores in use. voltage spikes at 1.45 V or higher are absolutely normal with a 3900X. Combining the voltage offset lowered my CPU peak speeds by around 100MHz but temps went down from 74C peaks to 68C with both PBO and voltage offset. I seen this alone with the crazy low voltages they report. We used a +0.4v VCCSA offset to get the memory that high and a 1.5v DRAM voltage. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Last edited by ZER0_K%; Apr 24 @ 4:25pm < > Showing 1-15 of 19 comments . MB Asus x570 - e and RAM 3600 8x4. Had some issues with mine id like to help with if they are similar and save you some time. It’s not a huge leap, but it’s a real improvement and the same behavior was shown on the X570 Master. Suffice it to say, the reports about undervolting the 3900x causing performance regression are … I'm fine with my CPU hitting mid-70s so I am going to just run PBO + AutoOC. Our conclusion is that yes, there is an easily reproducible bug where setting a vcore too low on Ryzen 3000 CPUs will cause a significant decrease in performance while reporting to HWiNFO that clocks and temperatures have improved. PBO enabled. Mein Wert liegt bei 4866. Hello ! You're supposed to watch temps under heavy load, not while idling. What about a little more? The Master actually outperformed the Godlike board here at stock as opposed to the tests with the 3600, so the trend of Ryzen 3000-related test variance continues. In multithreaded and single-threaded results for the R5 3600, it’s immediately obvious that applying 1V vcore tanked performance. Voltage below 725 mv are not accepted You should cut the maximum possible clock rate with the curve, otherwise the card will become unstable with too high clock rates in the peak. Lower temps and better benchmark scores. 3900x and Asus C8H. I run a d15 and I undervolt -0.075 or so. One-point-zero is a ridiculously low voltage to run for Ryzen 3000 CPUs, but both boards and both CPUs allowed us to set and boot at this voltage. Could you share your experience in this matter? For our final charts, we’ve stuck results from both boards together, because the point is simple: Tdie is vastly lower on both the R5 3600 and the 3900X with vcore set to 1V, and as the previous charts have shown clocks are higher, but that doesn’t mean performance is better. Launch hwinfo64 and monitor the boost clocks. Only 6% of Ryzen 9 3900X’s tested by CPU retail site Silicon Lottery are able to reach 4.2GHz manual all-core overclock. Derweil ist der Betrieb des Ryzen 9 3900X mit einem Offset von -.1V auf dem MSI X570 Godlike möglich. The reddit post was itself a response to a video where a YouTuber claimed to be lowering temperatures and boosting performance on Ryzen 3000 CPUs by lowering the vcore value in BIOS; we never did catch the video, as it has since been retracted and followed-up by the creator and community with new information. I noticed a number of sites and channels are reporting that the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core, 24-thread processor can be run at full clock speeds with just 1.00V on the CPU VCore. We’ve also zoomed the frequency charts to a 2000MHz range in order to make the differences more obvious. 1.4v when it actually isn't drawing much power is fine, just use a -0.05v offset, all 3900x can handle that without a dip in performance, or -0.1v if ur lucky. August 15, 2020. Keep doing increasing the offset and running the tests until your score decreases. Profil Beiträge anzeigen Private Nachricht Blog anzeigen Kabelverknoter(in) Themenstarter Mitglied seit 05.03.2014. Remember that when the A-Phase voltage is zero, the other two phases will not be at zero, so different phases will react to the same fault differently. However, 3 rd generation Ryzen CPU’s have the ability to use a maximum boost clock offset Under heavy load the 3900X can run at 1.1v with vdrop which is a great CPU. At stock, the Godlike performed slightly better than the Master, and the best undervolt offset we could manage didn’t significantly change either board’s score. Moving into the single-threaded test has the offset results averaging the highest VID. will cause the requested voltage per core (VID) to rise in response so that the end result is nearly the same. So, if you have a processor like the Ryzen 9 3900X with a maximum boost clock of 4.6GHz, no core will ever go beyond that value. The first is the high idle voltage, while idling the voltages do not drop below 1.38v, ranging from 1.44v to 1.38v, although I have to say that this is caused by the iCue software. But also, I have seen recommendations of - 0.05 offsets. Schon im ersten Anlauf knackt unser Core i7-7700K die 5-GHz-Grenze, wenngleich mit hohen 1,40 Volt. Reboot and increase the offset by -0.01 (so to -0.06).
Ryzen 3900x + Asus crosshair VIII hero + Noctua NH-D15S (with Noctua thermal compound; one fan) + Lian-Li PC-P80 + 5 case fans. Does it work for you? Οπότε έβαλα voltage offset -115mV* και επειδή πολλές φορές δουλεύει 100% για μέρες έβαλα να κάνει thermal throttle στους 77C να έχω το κεφάλι μου ήσυχο. Aug 20, 2019 @ 8:47pm Wait, I don't get it. I haven't build it yet. Copyright © 2021 GamersNexus, LLC. There will be some delay after submitting a comment. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Threadripper, EPYC, Navi, the next-gen consoles, news, rumours, show-off your build and more. I don't trust any of the programs readings. 0 Kudos Share. I have a 3900x with the stock cooler and a gigabyte x570 UD motherboard. tl;dr 'idle' spikes are nothing to worry about, but your overall idle temps seem off. Less voltage == less watts == longer time at boost. Hello ! So.. Lower voltage means, lower temps on … Reply. Snow. 130W resulted in max boost clocks of about 3.9-4.0MHz instead of the 4.1-4.2 that I got on stock settings. My personal strongest results are -0.075 or -0.08125 on CPU and leaving the SoC as-is. This is a quick and straightforward piece inspired by a Reddit post from about a week ago. Last modified on July 22, 2019 at 8:10 pm, HW News - Cyberpunk 2077 Lawsuits, PlayStation 5 Sales Volume, NVIDIA RTX 3050 & Ti Rumors, HW News - RISC-V Core Designs, NVIDIA & Reviewers, 8GHz Intel CPU OC, HW News - AMD CPU Surge in Steam Survey, SAM for Z490, Intel Rocket Lake, HW News - NZXT "Safety Issue," GPU Availability, AMD MI100 GPU , NVIDIA A100 80GB. I recommend a Small undervolt for a little performance. The 3900X, like the 3600, performed much worse than stock with vcore set to 1V. Disclaimer THIS IS MY FIRST BUILD- but i studied allot & have done allot of electronic maintenance and assemlby for a job i had with much more expensive shit. Auch wenn es hier nicht wirklich reingehört aber hat einer mal testdurchläufe gemacht bei cinebench r20 mit einem 3700x, energieplan v4 und offset auf -0,1 volt? 06.09.2018, 08:51 #4. derschlaechter73. 3. "3900x is running a bit hot and high voltage, but I figure that will get fixed with a motherboard update." When leaving everything else stock, setting a small negative vcore offset helped more and yielded more predictable behavior than setting a straight manual vcore, but the benefits varied by CPU, motherboard, and workload. Latest AMD drivers with AMD balance profile. Post yours. Funny thing is fully stock the CPU stays nearly 4GHz all the time with high voltage (low current of course), PBO Enhanced Mode 4 makes it settle more on desktop. It’s clear that the 1V vcore result isn’t actually performing better on either CPU, though, simply by a rough comparison of how much longer the test took to complete. So with the profile you want to set up selected, click the “FIVR” button in Throttlestop. In POV-Ray, running the 3900X at a flat 4.3GHz at 1.35V gives it a 8.2% performance boost over stock. Adaptive Mode will change the voltage depending on whether it’s idle or under load. Your ccx2 will be not as good silicon as the ccx0 so will hold you back. R9-3900X | GA-X570 Aorus Xtreme | 32GB 3600MHz CL17 | GTX 1070 | Samsung 970 Evo Plus Sabaj D3 | Superlux HD668B. These next two charts show vcore as logged by HWiNFO. I managed to overclock my 3900X to 4.3GHz across all cores – a big improvement from the 3.9GHz I achieved out of the box, but still a little short of AMDs claimed 4.6GHz. The offset value is added or subtracted from the Additional Turbo Mode CPU Core Voltage box, and the total is displayed in the Total Adaptive Mode CPU Core Voltage pane. ... AMD specifies 3200MHz as memory clock on the Ryzen 9 3900X. I cant remember the voltages i am set at, but it is low like.. 1.1x. Under heavy load the 3900X can run at 1.1v with vdrop which is a great CPU. I think i might have seen the temps jump to like 72°C while playing but it is a small 3 sec at most spike from mid to high 60's . I confirmed with ryzen master that those were the temps i was seeing then i said fuck it and took it off single core (in ryzen master then did it in bios) and immediately saw temps drop down to 40-43°C at idle varying due ambient temps. It’s up to AMD to explain why their CPUs do what they do; what we’re attempting to do in this piece is replicate the behavior and see if we can find a way to undervolt effectively. I’ve higlighted the Ryzen 7 2700: Enhancedcategory (there’s another category called “Ryzen 7 2700” that doesn’t have temperature or power consumption that we’ll ignore) 2. In my case and with my specific MOBO (Asus C6H - x370) the different Ryzen CPUs I had (3600x, 3700x and now 3900x) behaved in the same way: - High voltage at idle up to 1.5V - (Thus) 'high' idle temps: around 37-45ºC We also ran Blender and logged frequency, but the Cinebench numbers are plenty for now. These idle spikes are nothing to do with cooling, I got them with my H110i, and I've now got 3 x 360mm custom loop and I still get it, it's to do with the IHS not transferring the heat quick enough, so it lingers a bit and I see the temp rise from 30 to 50ish in a flash, but the heat isn't transferred into the water as it's not there long enough nor hot enough as it's only pulling ~50W during a spike. At the very least, this proves that the BIOS option is doing something, even if the end result isn’t what we want. The average core VID numbers stack up differently than the reported vcore. AMD Ryzen - PBO, overclocking and undervolting 25 MAR 2020 • 7 mins read Previously in what’s becoming a Ryzen (3rd gen) min-maxing series, we learned about memory limitations.This time around I’d like to introduce you to three different things that you can do with the clock and voltage. Let me tempt you with some stuff I just now did with my 3900x and Prime95 SmallFFTs as a proxy for a DC workload (yes, some DC workloads can actually be worse). Οπότε έβαλα voltage offset -115mV* και επειδή πολλές φορές δουλεύει 100% για μέρες έβαλα να κάνει thermal throttle στους 77C να έχω το κεφάλι μου ήσυχο. The clocks will appear normal or improved even though performance is reduced. Edit: specs Ryzen 3900x Cooler master 212 evo Aorus ultra 1.x mobo Aorus 2080 super waterforce Corsair 32g (16x2) 3200MHz 1TB samsung evo nvme m.2 4 nzxt case fans+ the rad and 2 fans from GPU. reboot. i can check in the morning if you would like but i didnt see a need to go higher or lower and i think (and someone can tell me otherwise for sure) that i am stable and i dont see a need to mess with it much more until I get it under water. 5 or so cores regularly hit that 4.6 plus. I haven't played with the voltage offset yet, but I did try adjusting the PPT from 142W to other levels. I'm not sure what you mean by "took it off single core", but there's something amiss with your setup I fear, you shouldn't be idling at > 60C. Beiträge 28. Voltage offset is your friend. I've gone more aggressive but this one is fine. The Division 2 Performance Review: Ubisoft Finally Makes DX12 Shine. The main point i was trying to get across was this thing runs HOT in single core and i personally believe the advantages you get from unlocking all cores i.e. So let's see some actual real measurements. Run an r20 test and record the score again. I have read that OC is probably not worth it, so I am planning to apply only XMP and PBO. Get all of Hollywood.com's best Movies lists, news, and more. Even though the original content was too good to be true, it was still based on a completely valid idea -- lowering voltage, 50% of the equation for power -- will theoretically reduce thermals and power load. Playing a game of MW i saw up to 98°C. He is looking at you saying "leave me auto dude, or if you wish give me some negative offset and leave me alone". Ryzen 9; 3900x heat, voltage and frequency issues thank u all. The 3900X showed the inverse, with stock and offset results both sticking to about 1.27V in the all-core load, and the gap showing itself instead in the single-threaded pass with stock vcore hitting 1.47-1.48V and the offset voltage holding at 1.39V. Put PBO on "Enhanced Mode 4" with a CPU voltage on offset mode of -0.1v. Next, we decrease the “Offset Voltage” slider, which is the undervolting part. My 3900x tops out at 4.650MHz and 1.506v. It didn’t on the 3600, but the 3900X was a different story. The next chart shows the same type of data, except on the R9 3900X instead. Ideally though you should aim for no more than 1.4v and 80*C. The other thing is that although the cooler that comes with the 3900X is actually not bad, it is however useless if you want to optimise your system because the Ryzen 3900X is very sensitive to temps and even a difference of 2° C makes a difference with regard to how high you can go with your clockspeeds This is not to say that Ryzen Master is useless and it is a useful tool. "3900x is running a bit hot and high voltage, but I figure that will get fixed with a motherboard update." So how far can I take the positive offset and whats the max safe voltage and temperature for long term use? Using a slight negative offset voltage with low LLC as @coercitiv suggested earlier should also work with the temp limit. Not random readings. For me the offset was the best thing I have done to boost performance and reduce temps. Not long got hold of my 3900x - coming from Intel historically I am trying to get my head round how it works! I run with a fairly high -0.120 undervolt offset but even with that I don't experience any stability or clock stretching. Congrats, you've got clock stretching. Ryzen 3900X voltage Hello, I recently acquired a 3900x CPU and I am experiencing several cases that I do not know if they would be normal. In theory you could tinker further using this method; reducing the voltage further may allow for cooler running, and you may have more luck in increasing frequency, it really comes down to the “silicon lottery”! I am receiving my 3900x in a few days. If you don't know what that is you need to watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JscRwIH3OAY. I have a 3900x with the stock cooler and a gigabyte x570 UD motherboard. Ich habe meine CPU AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900x auf 4,2 Ghz übertakten und die Vcore Voltage auf OFFSET + gestellt und er zieht unter 100% Last 1,50 VCPU ist das Normal das diese CPU so viel Volt zieht ? Do you agree? With clocks set on auto the CPU will clock stretch rather than crash when power starved. From just these numbers, it would appear that the 1V vcore results are the best, as the R5 3600 held a constant 4.2GHz throughout the three multithreaded passes as well as the long single threaded pass.